Saturday, October 13, 2012

[MHR 410] The Five Generic Competitive Strategies

Early in the process of crafting a strategy, company managers have to decide which of the five basic competitive strategies to employ:
  • overall low-cost
  • broad differentiation
  • focused low-cost
  • focused differentiation
  • best-cost provider.

Competitive Strategy
  • Deals exclusively with management’s game plan for competing successfully and securing a competitive advantage over rivals
    • Specific efforts to give customers superior value
      • A good product at a lower price
      • A superior product worth paying more for
      • An attractive mix of price, features, quality, service, and other appealing attributes

Competitive Strategies and Industry Positioning

Approaches to Achieving Low Costs

  • Perform essential value chain activities more cost-effectively than rivals
  • Revamp the firm’s overall value chain to eliminate or bypass some cost-producing activities altogether


When a Low Cost Strategy Works Best

  • Price competition is vigorous
  • Product is standardized
  • There are few ways to achieve differentiation
  • Buyers incur low switching costs
  • Buyers are large and have significant bargaining power
  • Industry newcomers use introductory low prices to attract buyers and build customer base


Differentiation Strategies

  • Powerful competitive approach whenever buyers’ needs and preferences are too diverse to be fully satisfied by a standardized product or service
  • Incorporate differentiating features that cause buyers to prefer firm’s product or service over brands of rivals
  • Not spending more to achieve differentiation than the price premium that customers are willing to pay for all the differentiating extras


Benefits of Successful Differentiation

  • Successfully executed differentiation strategies allow a company to:
    • Command a premium price, and/or
    • Increase unit sales, and/or
    • Gain buyer loyalty to its brand


Where to Find Opportunities to Differentiate

  • Supply chain activities
  • Product R&D and product design activities
  • Production R&D and technology-related activities
  • Manufacturing activities
  • Distribution-related activities
  • Marketing, sales, and customer service activities


Market Conditions Favoring a Differentiation Strategy

  • There are many ways to differentiate a product that have value and please customers
  • Buyer needs and uses are diverse
  • Few rivals are following a similar differentiation approach
  • Technological change and product innovation are fast-paced


Market Conditions Making a Focused Strategy Viable

  • The target niche is big enough to be profitable and offers good growth potential
  • Industry leaders have chosen not to compete in the niche
  • It is costly or difficult for multisegment competitors to meet the specialized needs of niche buyers
  • Industry has many niches and segments
  • Few rivals are attempting to specialize in the niche


Best Cost Provider Strategies

  • A hybrid of low cost provider and differentiation strategies
  • Giving customers more value for money by satisfying buyer expectations on key quality/features/performance/service attributes and beat customer expectations on price
  • Powerful competitive approach with value-conscious buyers


Employing Best Cost Strategies
Best Cost Strategies are contingent on:

  • A superior value chain configuration that eliminates or minimizes activities that do not add value
  • Unmatched efficiency in managing essential value chain activities
  • Resource strengths and core competencies that allow differentiating attributes to be incorporated at a low cost.


Danger of Unsound Best Cost Provider Strategy

  • Lack of requisite core competencies, efficiencies, and resources allowing the addition of differentiating features without significantly increasing costs could result in high prices relative to low-cost providers and poor product attributes relative to high-end differentiators.


Perils of “Stuck in the Middle” Strategy

  • Compromise strategies end up with a middle-of-the-pack industry rankings and provide for average performance
    • An average cost structure
    • Minimal product differentiation relative to rivals
    • An average image and reputation
    • Limited prospect of industry leadership
  • Compromise or middle-ground strategies rarely produce sustainable competitive advantage

No comments:

Post a Comment